Feasible service tracks
Runbooks, dashboards, reviews, and handoff material make the work auditable.
| Track | Best for | Typical outputs |
|---|---|---|
| AI discovery and readiness | Teams with many AI ideas and no delivery sequence | Use-case shortlist, data/source map, risk review, architecture options, cost assumptions, and implementation roadmap |
| RAG and internal assistants | Support, operations, product, or engineering teams that need answers grounded in approved sources | Ingestion pipeline, retrieval/index strategy, citations, permissions, feedback loop, evaluation dataset, deployment, and runbook |
| LLMOps foundation | Teams with multiple AI prototypes, provider choices, or unclear spend and release controls | Model gateway or provider abstraction, prompt/config versioning, budgets, eval runner, dashboards, and release gates |
| Agentic workflow implementation | Teams automating bounded multi-step workflows | Workflow map, tool policies, state/checkpointing, human approvals, traces, dry-run path, and pilot rollout |
| AI observability and evaluation | Teams operating AI features without enough visibility | Model/tool/retrieval traces, token and cost attribution, quality checks, regression tests, alerts, and review cadence |
| AI governance for engineering teams | Security and platform teams formalizing AI adoption | Usage inventory, data-handling rules, model/provider policy, approval gates, logging/redaction rules, and audit evidence |
| AI-ready data platform work | Teams whose data estate blocks reliable AI | Data pipelines, freshness checks, metadata, search/vector indexes, access controls, and ownership documentation |