Know which security risks to fix first

Before the audit starts, we confirm the scope, access, and testing boundaries so the assessment is useful and safe.

If access is limited, we document that limitation in the report and focus recommendations on the evidence that can be verified.

The audit is grounded in evidence, not assumptions. Common inputs include:

• cloud account and organization structure
• Kubernetes manifests, Helm charts, policy configuration, and cluster inventory
• repository structure, dependency manifests, package-lock data, and image build paths
• CI/CD workflows, environment approval rules, runner configuration, and secrets usage
• IdP, SSO, MFA, group, role, service-account, and privileged-access exports
• public DNS, load balancers, ingress, WAF, CDN, bucket, and API gateway configuration
• logging, monitoring, alert, SIEM, and incident ticket samples
• backup configuration, restore-test history, and disaster recovery runbooks
• policy documents, customer security questionnaires, and prior compliance gap lists

When compliance readiness is in scope, findings are mapped to control areas so engineering work can support audit preparation or customer-security conversations.

The report can support SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, customer questionnaire, or internal control work, but it is not a certification or legal opinion.

1. Scope and access — define systems, environments, repositories, cloud accounts, compliance goals, and testing boundaries.
2. Discovery — map assets, identities, data paths, deployment paths, externally exposed surfaces, and operational owners.
3. Assessment — review configuration, architecture, source or dependency data where in scope, and operating process.
4. Validation — confirm high-risk findings, collect reproducible evidence, and distinguish exploitable issues from scanner noise.
5. Risk analysis — rank findings by impact, likelihood, exploitability, exposure, data sensitivity, and business context.
6. Report and walkthrough — present executive summary, technical findings, remediation plan, control mapping, and next-step options.
7. Remediation planning — translate findings into owners, tickets, target dates, validation steps, and optional implementation support.

Security audits are valuable only if findings become fixable work.

• executive summary for leadership
• technical findings report with evidence
• severity-ranked remediation checklist
• affected systems, likely impact, and recommended owner for each finding
• compliance or control mapping where in scope
• discovery notes that explain what was reviewed and what was excluded
• vulnerability workflow recommendations and remediation SLA guidance
• incident, logging, backup, or DR readiness observations where relevant
• follow-up session to answer implementation questions

• security priorities are ranked instead of debated from anecdotes
• known external exposure and privileged access are documented
• remediation work can be assigned to engineering owners
• compliance gaps are visible before the formal audit process
• repeatable checks can be added to CI/CD or cloud governance
• leadership can track risk reduction over time
• accepted risks are explicit instead of hidden in unresolved tickets

Your team remains responsible for:

• identifying the systems, data, and compliance goals that must be in scope
• granting safe read-only or limited access needed for assessment
• approving production testing boundaries and emergency contacts
• providing current architecture, operational, and policy information
• deciding whether to accept, defer, or remediate identified risks
• involving legal, privacy, HR, finance, or audit stakeholders when their review is required
• maintaining controls and evidence after the audit is complete

This is not an unlimited penetration test, red-team exercise, legal opinion, insurance assessment, or compliance certification. We do not perform destructive testing, social engineering, credential harvesting, or production-impacting activity without explicit rules of engagement. If you need formal penetration testing, red-team exercises, PCI assessment, SOC 2 examination, or ISO certification support, we scope those separately with the required independent parties.

• Consulting overview — advisory reviews and decision-support offers
• Security & Compliance — control implementation, evidence paths, and compliance readiness
• DevSecOps as a Service — ongoing remediation and security engineering support
• Disaster Recovery Planning — backup validation, failover, and recovery runbooks
• Technology Consulting — platform, SaaS, commerce, and governance decisions
• Infrastructure Audit — broad architecture, reliability, cost, and security assessment
• CI/CD Audit — focused delivery pipeline and supply-chain review
• Cloud Cost Optimization — cost governance where spend and ownership create risk
• Cloud Account Management — ongoing cloud governance and security hygiene
• SRE as a Service — reliability and incident operating model

Start by scoping the audit. We will confirm systems, access, testing boundaries, compliance goals, and the report format your team needs.

Schedule security audit →

How long does a security audit take? A focused audit can often be completed in one to two weeks after access is ready. Larger environments or compliance mapping can take longer.

Do you need source-code access? Only if application or dependency review is in scope. Many infrastructure-focused audits can start with cloud, Kubernetes, CI/CD, and architecture access.

Can you help fix findings? Yes. Remediation support can be scoped as a follow-up project or ongoing plan.

Will the report satisfy customers or auditors? The report can support customer-security and compliance conversations, but it is not a formal certification unless separately scoped with the required audit body.