Make production reliability visible and manageable

Use Emergency Response when production is actively down or severely degraded. Use SRE as a Service when the recurring problem is reliability practice, signal quality, incident readiness, or ongoing production support.

View the full pricing comparison →

1. Fit and responsibility call — confirm services, business impact, team owners, support hours, incident expectations, and commercial plan fit.
2. Access and evidence collection — review dashboards, alert rules, incident history, repositories, deploy paths, runbooks, architecture notes, and current escalation channels.
3. Current-state assessment — map service ownership, known failure modes, noisy alerts, missing signals, and operational risks.
4. Reliability operating plan — define scope, cadence, deliverables, severity model, backlog priorities, and boundaries before making tooling changes.
5. Implementation and coaching — tune alerts, dashboards, runbooks, SLO candidates, incident templates, and review practices through visible work.
6. Validation and handoff — test the operating model with a tabletop exercise, real incident review, controlled scenario, or launch-readiness review.
7. Recurring service cadence — keep the reliability backlog, alert quality, incident follow-up, and operating evidence current.

SRE work depends on access, ownership, and instrumentation quality. We avoid promising specific uptime numbers until the architecture, dependency surface, measurement windows, and operational control are understood.

• fewer unactionable pages
• alerts routed to the right owners with useful context
• incident roles and stakeholder updates defined before the next incident
• dashboards that explain service health instead of only infrastructure symptoms
• reliability backlog ranked by risk, effort, and validation method
• post-incident follow-up tracked to completion
• SLO candidates reviewed by engineers and stakeholders together
• launch and change risk reviewed before production impact

• named technical owner for each in-scope service
• access to monitoring, logs, traces, alert routing, incident history, deployment process, and architecture context
• product or business owner who can define user impact and service priority
• responders available to review runbooks and participate in incident or tabletop exercises
• agreement on which services are in scope and which remain outside the engagement
• change process for alert rules, dashboards, escalation policies, repositories, and production configuration

SRE as a Service improves reliability practice and production operations within an agreed boundary. These usually require separate scope:

• full platform rebuilds, migrations, or major application rewrites
• unlimited incident response outside the selected plan and severity model
• formal uptime guarantees before architecture and measurement review
• legal, compliance, or forensic incident work unless explicitly included
• taking permanent ownership of application code without application-team participation
• replacing every observability tool when the existing stack can be improved responsibly
• changes that require provider, vendor, or internal approvals we cannot obtain

We work with your current observability stack first. Replacement is recommended only when it improves reliability, maintainability, or operating cost.

• Prometheus — Metrics, alert rules, service-level indicators, and reliability reviews
• Grafana — Dashboards that connect service health, incidents, and operational decisions

Common integrations include Grafana, Prometheus, Loki, ELK/OpenSearch, Datadog, New Relic, CloudWatch, Jaeger, OpenTelemetry, PagerDuty, Opsgenie, Slack, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Kubernetes, Terraform, and managed cloud services.

We do not promise universal uptime numbers without reviewing architecture, dependencies, deployment process, traffic, third-party services, operational control, and measurement windows. If a formal SLA is needed, we scope it separately around explicit systems and responsibilities.

We also do not treat SLOs as decoration. If the telemetry is incomplete, ownership is unclear, or the service boundary is not understood, we will recommend simpler readiness work before using SLOs for decisions.

• DevOps as a Service — delivery automation and release systems
• Managed Kubernetes — Kubernetes platform operations
• Kubernetes Support — support for existing clusters
• Infrastructure Audit — broad infrastructure risk review
• Cloud Account Management — cloud governance and operations
• Emergency Response — urgent stabilization when production is already degraded
• Disaster Recovery Planning — backup, restore, failover, and recovery-readiness planning
• Service Plans and Pricing — plan comparison and commercial model

Start with a reliability assessment. We will review monitoring, incident flow, production risks, and service ownership, then return a scoped plan for what to fix first.

Request reliability assessment →

What is the difference between SRE and traditional operations? SRE applies engineering discipline to reliability work. In practice, that means measurable service health, clear ownership, usable runbooks, incident review, and automation that reduces repeated toil.

Can you work with our existing monitoring tools? Yes. We start with the tools you already use and improve signal quality before recommending replacements.

Do you provide 24/7 incident response? We can provide on-call or escalation support when it is explicitly scoped to agreed services, severity definitions, access, and responsibilities. Active one-off outages can also start through Emergency Response.

Can you guarantee 99.9% uptime? Not without a formal review and scoped SLA. We avoid generic uptime guarantees because measured availability depends on architecture, dependencies, deployment practice, and operational control.

Do we need SLOs before starting? No. Many teams start with basic service maps, alerts, dashboards, and runbooks. SLOs come later when service boundaries, telemetry, and ownership are mature enough.

Will you replace our on-call team? Usually no. We improve the operating model and can provide escalation support when scoped, but application ownership and business-impact decisions still need your team.